But isolation so Rygh coverage to write

12.12.13 Minerva published an opinion piece by Oda Rygh. The purpose of the debate post, according to Rygh, was to come with his reflections around the picture like "Football Lady" posted only three days after birth. Rygh tracks early on, and perform rather than an outright character assassination pure bully style.
What little I and Caroline has been with us from the debate around the belly picture has been relatively objective. Most have been able to discuss the matter, and rarely person. Until Oda Rygh came on ...
Rygh therefore want to participate in the debate around the world-famous belly image for Soccer Lady, but her post is all in little about this, but in the greater degree of stepping Caroline Berg Eriksen and her alter ego, Soccer Lady, so far down in the mud as possible. She does this by going to the plant's history and dig up things from Caroline's life before she all started blogging. It is clear that Mr Rygh has an agenda and it is not hard to see that she dislikes Football lady greatly. So strong that she is already in the planning phase of new criticism directed against the use of children as an advertising poster. Here she reveals that she is not interested in the actual case, but more interested in "taking" Soccer Lady. Because client list lifetime there is already top bloggers that greatly exposes their children and make money at it, why does she not just this criticism now directed towards? Why must she wait until Football lady possibly do?
Rygh has set the standard, so this post will not be about abdominal image to Caroline, but I'm going instead to pick apart the criticism that comes with Rygh, based on facts.
Until now I have to agree. One should as much as possible the separation of character and Soccer Lady Caroline Berg Eriksen. But a clearly defined distinction does not exist, and any criticism of Soccer Lady will to varying degrees be transferred to Caroline Berg Eriksen. As we shall see further, then Ryghs attempt to implement this distinction, close to the vain.
All this is directly transferable to Caroline. But Caroline has never claimed that she's diet and fitness expert, client list lifetime she has, in my view never given the impression that, she plays with open cards. These are statements that are left for Ryghs expense. client list lifetime
Caroline records recipes on your blog and share very superficial their exercise client list lifetime routines. Do you have the expertise to do this? No! There are hundreds of matbloggere around the web, many of which have expertise in nutrition physiology or are trained chef? How many shares his workout routines are trained in the discipline? Very few! We are in 2013, people share their experiences in social media, to criticize someone for lacking education is just silly. The times Caroline writes detailed about exercise and diet has been in consultation with persons with relevant utdannels e. Both PT'er, doctors and nutritionists. Caroline driver therefore not negligent dietary and exercise counseling.
But what are really Rygh with his private blog? Well, let's see ... Recent posts are (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) mostly about her strained relationship with food (she calls herself client list lifetime a food fanatics), in addition to lots of recipes. This is the suspiciously similar to some of the things Caroline writes about, with the exception of the strained relationship with food that Rygh expressed in each post. However, Rygh any formal training in nutrition client list lifetime or cooking? No! Why she says when it's okay for her but not for Caroline posting recipes?
1 Caroline was previously disordered eating client list lifetime - Correction: Caroline had a brief period of life in which she had a strained client list lifetime relationship with food and body, a more apt description would be "disturbed diet pattern". Giving Caroline diagnosis of disordered eating on this basis is an insult to those who truly have eating disorders. She does not satisfy the requirements to provide this diagnosis. Yes, I know Caroline has stated in interviews client list lifetime that she had an eating disorder, but it is due to a misunderstanding about the definition of the term. Looking at the Norwegian HUNT study, which uses the description "eating problem" to embrace broader than "eating disorder", as many as 47% of all girls have this depending on the definition. When there are many bloggers out there who are in for criticism by Rygh.
But isolation so Rygh coverage to write "former disordered eating", Carolines own quotes basis for this. But is it relevant? Do not eat previously disturbed to share recipes on your blog? Should we not look at the recipes themselves, and evaluate based on that, instead of going seven years back in time with one that PDD. is healthy? What Rygh yourself? She's a self-proclaimed food fanatics and overweight. Overeating can also be a form of eating disorder, there must be no other way. Believe